An observed celestial phenomenon characterized by intermittent bursts of blue and red light emanating from a seemingly singular point in the night sky often prompts inquiry. Such occurrences can be attributed to a variety of causes, ranging from atmospheric effects and artificial satellites to more earthly explanations like aircraft. Understanding the potential sources is crucial in accurately interpreting these visual events.
The significance of investigating these phenomena lies in discerning between natural astronomical occurrences and human-made objects or atmospheric distortions. Historically, unexplained celestial lights have fueled speculation and misinterpretation. Accurate identification, through scientific observation and analysis, avoids unfounded conclusions and contributes to a more complete understanding of the night sky. Furthermore, distinguishing between genuine astronomical events and artificial sources is vital for maintaining the integrity of scientific data and preventing the spread of misinformation.
Subsequent sections will delve into the specific factors that can produce these visual effects, including the role of atmospheric conditions, the behavior of artificial satellites, and the influence of aircraft lighting. Analysis of these elements provides a framework for evaluating similar observations and fostering a more informed perspective on the dynamic nature of the night sky.
1. Atmospheric Distortion
Atmospheric distortion plays a significant role in the perceived characteristics of celestial objects, and is a primary factor to consider when investigating sightings of “blue and red flashing star in sky.” Variations in air density, temperature gradients, and turbulence within the Earth’s atmosphere can refract and scatter light from distant sources. This refraction causes light to deviate from its straight path, leading to twinkling, shimmering, or apparent color changes in observed objects. The effect is particularly pronounced near the horizon, where the observer’s line of sight passes through a greater amount of atmosphere. The combination of these distortions can create the illusion of rapid color shifts, appearing as red and blue flashes. A prime example occurs when viewing stars near the horizon; the light must travel through a thicker layer of atmosphere, causing greater refraction and resulting in more pronounced color separation and apparent twinkling. These atmospheric effects are crucial to understand, as they often misattribute ordinary celestial phenomena to more exotic sources.
The impact of atmospheric conditions extends beyond simple color shifts. The phenomenon of atmospheric seeing, which refers to the degree of turbulence in the atmosphere, directly affects the sharpness and stability of images obtained through telescopes or even with the naked eye. Poor seeing conditions can cause the image of a star to blur and dance around, intensifying the observed flashing effect. Furthermore, the presence of pollutants or dust particles in the atmosphere can selectively scatter certain wavelengths of light, further altering the apparent color of the object. A hazy or polluted sky tends to scatter blue light more effectively, potentially enhancing the prominence of red light from a distant source. This complex interplay of atmospheric factors often complicates the accurate identification of celestial objects and contributes to the misinterpretation of visual observations.
In summary, atmospheric distortion is a major contributor to the perceived “blue and red flashing star in sky.” Understanding these effects is essential for distinguishing between genuine astronomical events and optical illusions caused by the Earth’s atmosphere. Accurate assessment necessitates considering air density, temperature gradients, turbulence, and the presence of particulate matter. Proper identification strategies involve corroborating observations with known meteorological conditions and employing specialized observing techniques that minimize the influence of atmospheric disturbance. Acknowledging the role of atmospheric distortion is critical for maintaining scientific rigor in the investigation of celestial phenomena.
2. Satellite reflection
The phenomenon of satellite reflection is a pertinent consideration when attempting to explain the observation of what appears to be a “blue and red flashing star in sky.” Artificial satellites orbiting Earth are capable of reflecting sunlight, and these reflections can manifest as brief, intense flashes of light visible from the ground. Under specific circumstances, atmospheric effects and the satellite’s orientation can contribute to perceived color variations during these reflections.
-
Specular Reflection and Satellite Glint
Specular reflection occurs when sunlight reflects directly off a smooth, reflective surface of the satellite, such as a solar panel or antenna. When the angle of incidence equals the angle of reflection, an observer on the ground witnesses a concentrated burst of light, often referred to as a satellite glint. If the satellite is rotating or tumbling, the glint may appear as a sudden flash, contributing to the illusion of intermittent light emission. The intensity and duration of these glints depend on the size and reflectivity of the surface, the satellite’s distance, and the atmospheric conditions.
-
Atmospheric Refraction and Color Shift
As reflected sunlight passes through the Earth’s atmosphere, refraction can separate the constituent colors of light. Shorter wavelengths (blue and violet) are scattered more effectively than longer wavelengths (red and orange). If a satellite glint occurs near the horizon, the increased path length through the atmosphere enhances this scattering effect. Consequently, the observed flash may exhibit a brief shift towards the red end of the spectrum as blue light is attenuated, potentially contributing to the “blue and red flashing” perception.
-
Satellite Orientation and Material Composition
The orientation of a satellite relative to the observer and the Sun is critical in determining the intensity and color of the reflection. Satellites equipped with materials that selectively reflect certain wavelengths of light could, theoretically, produce colored glints. While most satellite surfaces are designed for thermal regulation and communication rather than aesthetic color effects, variations in material composition across different satellite components could contribute to subtle color variations in the reflected light. Moreover, rapid changes in satellite orientation during a glint event could alter the perceived color of the reflected light as different surfaces become illuminated.
-
Interference from Space Debris
The presence of space debris in Earth’s orbit further complicates the identification of satellite reflections. Smaller pieces of debris can also reflect sunlight, creating brief, unpredictable flashes. The cumulative effect of multiple debris reflections, combined with the movement of operational satellites, can lead to a complex pattern of light emissions in the night sky. Distinguishing between reflections from operational satellites and those from space debris requires precise tracking data and careful observation techniques.
In conclusion, satellite reflections are a plausible explanation for the observed “blue and red flashing star in sky,” particularly when considering the effects of atmospheric refraction, satellite orientation, and the potential for multiple glints from both operational satellites and space debris. Precise observation and analysis of satellite tracking data are essential for accurately identifying the source of such visual phenomena.
3. Aircraft Navigation
Aircraft navigation lights are designed to provide critical information regarding an aircraft’s position, direction, and status, particularly during nighttime or low-visibility conditions. The configuration and characteristics of these lights, including their color and flashing patterns, can, under certain circumstances, create the visual effect of a “blue and red flashing star in sky” when viewed from a distance. This is especially pertinent when considering the observer’s viewing angle, atmospheric conditions, and the limitations of visual perception.
Specifically, modern aircraft often incorporate high-intensity strobe lights, frequently white, in conjunction with navigation lights traditionally colored red (on the left wingtip) and green (on the right wingtip). In addition, some aircraft may utilize blue lights, particularly on law enforcement or emergency response aircraft. The rapid flashing of these strobe lights, combined with the steady or intermittent illumination of the red and green navigation lights, can, at a sufficient distance, appear to coalesce into a single, rapidly flashing point of light exhibiting a spectrum of colors. The atmospheric scattering of light, especially under humid or hazy conditions, can further diffuse these colors, enhancing the perceived effect of a colored, flashing point source. Furthermore, the curvature of the Earth and the altitude of the aircraft can contribute to an observer only perceiving certain lights, particularly the strobe and red light, creating the precise impression of “blue and red flashing star in sky”. A practical example of this phenomenon might occur near an airport, where multiple aircraft are operating at night. An observer viewing from a distance could easily misinterpret the combined lighting signatures of these aircraft as an unusual celestial object.
In conclusion, while genuine astronomical phenomena can exhibit varied colors and light patterns, the possibility of misinterpreting aircraft navigation lights as an anomalous celestial event warrants careful consideration. Understanding the standard lighting configurations of aircraft and the potential for atmospheric distortion is essential in accurately identifying the source of visual observations in the night sky. The accurate identification of such phenomena promotes informed observation and prevents the unnecessary attribution of mundane occurrences to extraordinary causes.
4. Light scattering
Light scattering, a fundamental physical phenomenon, significantly influences the appearance of celestial objects observed from Earth. In the context of a perceived “blue and red flashing star in sky,” understanding the mechanisms and effects of light scattering is essential for accurate interpretation and differentiation from other potential sources of visual anomalies.
-
Rayleigh Scattering and Atmospheric Color
Rayleigh scattering, the dominant form of scattering by particles smaller than the wavelength of light, preferentially scatters shorter wavelengths, such as blue and violet, more effectively than longer wavelengths, like red and orange. This phenomenon is responsible for the blue color of the daytime sky. When observing a distant light source through the atmosphere, Rayleigh scattering can attenuate the blue components of the light, leading to a perceived reddening of the source. In situations where atmospheric conditions are variable, changes in scattering intensity can result in apparent color fluctuations, contributing to the “flashing” effect. If a distant object emits white light and atmospheric conditions are right, the scattered blue light might create the illusion of a blue flash, followed or preceded by a relatively redder light due to less scattering.
-
Mie Scattering and Particle Size
Mie scattering occurs when the scattering particles are approximately the same size or larger than the wavelength of light. This type of scattering is less wavelength-dependent than Rayleigh scattering and is commonly associated with aerosols, dust, and water droplets in the atmosphere. Mie scattering tends to scatter light more forward, but also contributes to the overall reduction in visibility. In environments with high concentrations of particulate matter, Mie scattering can significantly alter the color and intensity of observed light sources. Increased scattering of some colors can shift the light’s perceived color. If the atmosphere varies, or the particulate concentration fluctuates, the scattering can cause intermittent shifts in color leading to a “flashing” effect.
-
Scattering and Atmospheric Turbulence
Atmospheric turbulence, characterized by variations in air density and temperature, creates localized regions of varying refractive index. Light passing through these turbulent regions experiences multiple scattering events, leading to scintillation, or “twinkling,” of celestial objects. The rapid, random fluctuations in light intensity caused by atmospheric turbulence can exacerbate the perception of color variations. Specifically, the differential scattering of blue and red light by turbulent air pockets may contribute to the apparent flashing of these colors from a distant point source. The interaction of turbulent pockets shifting can make it seem like a distant light source is flashing red and blue due to differences in scattering by differing levels of turbulence.
-
Light Pollution and Background Scatter
Light pollution, the artificial illumination of the night sky, creates a diffuse background of scattered light that can significantly affect the visibility of faint celestial objects. The presence of light pollution increases the overall scattering of light within the atmosphere, reducing contrast and potentially altering the perceived colors of distant sources. Artificial light sources often emit a broad spectrum of wavelengths, and the selective scattering of these wavelengths can contribute to the impression of a colored, flashing object. A distant light may seem dimmer due to light pollution, but also may have its colors enhanced by the artificial background. Increased light pollution can lead to misinterpreting reflections as the true source of light, thereby compounding the error.
The interplay of these scattering mechanisms underscores the importance of considering atmospheric conditions when interpreting observations of celestial objects. The phenomenon of “blue and red flashing star in sky” may be a complex interplay of atmospheric and reflective conditions. Accurate analysis requires considering atmospheric conditions and possible light sources to explain the origin of the colored, flashing light.
5. Signal interference
Signal interference, while not a direct source of light itself, can contribute to the misinterpretation of light sources, potentially leading an observer to perceive a “blue and red flashing star in sky.” This occurs when electronic signals disrupt or alter the operation of equipment designed to emit light. The altered light output, in turn, can create the illusion of an anomalous celestial event. For example, radio frequency interference (RFI) impacting an aircraft’s lighting control systems could induce erratic flashing patterns or unintended color changes in the aircraft’s navigation lights. Similarly, malfunctions in ground-based lighting systems, triggered by electromagnetic interference (EMI), can produce erratic light displays visible from afar, mimicking the appearance of a celestial object displaying unusual behavior. The importance of understanding signal interference lies in differentiating between genuine astronomical phenomena and artifacts of technological malfunction, a crucial step in accurately interpreting observations of the night sky.
Further contributing to this misinterpretation is the complex interaction of light sources with atmospheric conditions and human perception. As discussed previously, atmospheric scattering can alter the perceived color of light, and the rapid flashing of strobes or navigation lights can be perceived as intermittent color changes due to the limitations of human visual processing. Signal interference disrupting these lights can exacerbate these effects. Consider, for example, a distant communication tower with malfunctioning strobe lights due to RFI. An observer, viewing the tower through hazy atmospheric conditions, may perceive the intermittent flashes and distorted colors as a “blue and red flashing star,” unaware of the true source of the light. This highlights the need for comprehensive investigation, encompassing not only astronomical explanations, but also technological factors and environmental influences when confronted with unusual observations.
In conclusion, signal interference, while not directly emitting light, plays an indirect yet significant role in potentially creating the illusion of a “blue and red flashing star in sky.” Disruptions to lighting control systems, whether in aircraft or ground-based installations, can generate erratic light patterns and color changes that, when combined with atmospheric effects and perceptual limitations, lead to misinterpretation. The key insight is recognizing the importance of considering technological factors alongside astronomical and environmental explanations when investigating unusual visual phenomena. Thorough investigation, including examination of potential interference sources and assessment of atmospheric conditions, is crucial for accurate identification and interpretation of these occurrences.
6. Telescope artifact
Telescopic observations, while enhancing our ability to view distant celestial objects, are susceptible to the introduction of artifacts. These artifacts, stemming from the instrument itself or the observational process, can distort the observed image, leading to misinterpretations such as perceiving a “blue and red flashing star in sky” when no such phenomenon exists.
-
Chromatic Aberration
Chromatic aberration arises due to the varying refractive indices of lens materials for different wavelengths of light. This results in a colored fringe around bright objects, with blue and red hues being most pronounced. When observing a point source through a telescope exhibiting chromatic aberration, the observer might perceive intermittent shifts in color as atmospheric turbulence causes the image to dance within the focal plane. The perceived “flashing” effect is not inherent to the object itself, but rather an artifact of the telescope’s optical design.
-
Optical Aberrations (Coma, Astigmatism)
Optical aberrations, such as coma and astigmatism, distort the shape of the observed image, particularly towards the edges of the field of view. Coma creates a comet-like appearance, while astigmatism produces elongated or elliptical images. These aberrations can blur the light from a point source, spreading it across multiple pixels on a detector or over a larger area on the retina. Changes in atmospheric conditions or slight adjustments in the telescope’s focus can alter the severity and orientation of these aberrations, potentially leading to the perception of fluctuating colors, especially if the light source is already exhibiting subtle color variations.
-
Internal Reflections and Ghosting
Internal reflections within the telescope’s optical system can create ghost images or spurious reflections that overlay the primary image. These reflections can be colored due to selective reflection by optical coatings or the internal structure of the telescope. In the case of a bright point source, internal reflections might produce faint, colored spots near the object, which, under certain observing conditions, could be perceived as intermittent flashes of blue and red light. This effect is often more pronounced in telescopes with complex optical designs or those lacking effective anti-reflection coatings.
-
Detector Artifacts (Blooming, Read Noise)
Electronic detectors, such as CCDs or CMOS sensors, are prone to artifacts that can affect the captured image. Blooming occurs when excess charge from a bright source spills over into adjacent pixels, creating a streak or halo around the object. Read noise, inherent to the detector’s electronics, introduces random variations in pixel values. These detector artifacts can interact with the light from a point source, potentially creating the illusion of color variations or rapid fluctuations in intensity. For example, blooming could spread the light of a white point source into neighboring pixels, with slight color variations due to the detector’s spectral response, leading to the impression of a colored flash.
The proper calibration and careful use of telescopes are essential to minimize these artifacts. Observations made with inadequate equipment, or without appropriate correction for instrumental errors, are prone to misinterpretation. Understanding the potential for these distortions is crucial for accurately interpreting telescopic observations and distinguishing between genuine astronomical phenomena and instrumentally induced artifacts contributing to misinterpreting a light source such as a star as a “blue and red flashing star in sky”.
7. Observation angle
The observation angle, the angle at which an observer views a light source, is a critical determinant in the perception of color and intensity variations, significantly influencing the likelihood of identifying an object as exhibiting a “blue and red flashing star in sky” effect. This angle affects the path length of light through the atmosphere, impacting atmospheric scattering and refraction. A lower angle, closer to the horizon, increases atmospheric path length, leading to greater scattering of blue light and an apparent reddening of the light source. Conversely, a higher angle reduces atmospheric path length, minimizing these effects. A real-world example is observing aircraft navigation lights; from a low angle, the red light on the left wing might be more prominent due to preferential scattering, creating a flashing red impression, while a strobe light might contribute intermittent flashes of other colors. Without understanding this angle, observers may mistakenly attribute the fluctuating color display to unusual celestial phenomena.
The practical significance of considering observation angle extends to various contexts, including satellite tracking and astronomical observation. In satellite tracking, the angle at which sunlight reflects off the satellite’s surfaces and reaches the observer determines the intensity and color of the observed flash. Different satellite surfaces have different reflectivities, and as the satellite rotates, the observation angle changes, resulting in variations in the observed color and intensity. Furthermore, the angle of view affects how turbulence affects the perceived image. Observers, thus, need to consider not only the properties of the light source itself, but also the geometric conditions of the observation. Sophisticated astronomical instruments often incorporate angle-dependent corrections to account for atmospheric effects, ensuring the most accurate data possible. In general, without compensating for the observation angle effects, the perceived characteristics of a distant light source can be drastically different than the light source’s actual spectral output.
In summary, the observation angle is a fundamental factor in understanding the perceived characteristics of a light source, including the illusory effect of a “blue and red flashing star in sky.” Variations in this angle alter the atmospheric path length, influencing scattering and refraction, which in turn affect the perceived color and intensity. Recognizing the importance of observation angle enables more accurate interpretations of visual observations, minimizing the risk of misattributing common occurrences to extraordinary phenomena. Challenges in accurately determining the observation angle, due to terrain or obstruction, emphasizes the value in leveraging additional observation points and technological analysis.
8. Electromagnetic radiation
Electromagnetic radiation, encompassing a broad spectrum of energy ranging from radio waves to gamma rays, plays a crucial role in the perception and potential misinterpretation of celestial phenomena, specifically concerning observations of what may appear as a “blue and red flashing star in sky.” The following details the relevant aspects of electromagnetic radiation that contribute to this phenomenon.
-
Spectral Emission of Light Sources
Every light source emits electromagnetic radiation across a specific range of wavelengths, known as its emission spectrum. The perceived color of the light is directly related to the dominant wavelengths within this spectrum. For instance, a source with strong emissions in the blue and red portions of the visible spectrum will appear bluish-red. Malfunctioning equipment, such as navigational beacons or specialized lighting, could exhibit erratic spectral emissions, creating the illusion of a flashing, multi-colored light source in the sky.
-
Atmospheric Absorption and Transmission
The Earth’s atmosphere selectively absorbs and transmits different wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation. Certain atmospheric gases, such as ozone and water vapor, strongly absorb ultraviolet and infrared radiation, while visible light is largely transmitted. This atmospheric filtering can alter the observed color of a distant light source, particularly when viewed at low angles, as light travels through a greater amount of atmosphere. Atmospheric conditions may enhance the perceived “blue and red flashing,” depending on the amount of particulate matter and wavelength-specific absorption.
-
Electronic Interference and Light Modulation
Electronic systems used to control and modulate light sources can be susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). External electromagnetic fields can disrupt the intended operation of these systems, causing unintended changes in the light’s intensity, color, or flashing pattern. This type of interference could lead to a stable white light source appearing as a “blue and red flashing star” in the night sky if its internal circuitry is being affected. For example, radio frequencies impacting an aircraft’s lighting circuits might cause erratic color fluctuations.
-
Cerenkov Radiation and Atmospheric Phenomena
While less common, certain atmospheric phenomena can generate electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum. One example is Cerenkov radiation, produced when charged particles travel through a medium (such as air) at a speed greater than the speed of light in that medium. While this typically presents as a faint blue glow, certain high altitude events or experimental conditions near sensitive observation equipment, could potentially lead to unusual visual events in the night sky. The intermittent and unpredictable nature of these phenomena might contribute to observations of unusual colored light sources.
In summary, understanding the various ways in which electromagnetic radiation interacts with light sources, the atmosphere, and electronic systems is essential for accurately interpreting observations of the night sky. Apparent anomalies, such as the “blue and red flashing star in sky,” can often be explained by considering the influence of these factors on the emitted, transmitted, and detected electromagnetic energy.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions and answers address common inquiries regarding sightings of a “blue and red flashing star in sky,” providing explanations rooted in scientific understanding and observation.
Question 1: What are the most probable causes for observing what appears to be a “blue and red flashing star in sky?”
The likely explanations involve a combination of factors, including atmospheric distortion, reflections from artificial satellites or space debris, and the presence of aircraft with synchronized navigation lights. Light pollution from terrestrial sources can also contribute to these phenomena.
Question 2: How does atmospheric distortion affect the perception of celestial objects?
Atmospheric turbulence and variations in air density cause refraction and scattering of light, resulting in the twinkling effect of stars. These atmospheric effects can separate colors of light, leading to an apparent flashing of red and blue hues, particularly when observing objects near the horizon.
Question 3: Can satellite reflections create the impression of a colored, flashing light?
Yes. Sunlight reflected off satellite surfaces, especially solar panels, can appear as brief, intense flashes known as glints. The orientation of the satellite and atmospheric conditions can alter the perceived color of the glint, potentially mimicking a colored flashing light.
Question 4: What role do aircraft navigation lights play in these visual phenomena?
Aircraft are equipped with navigation lights, including red and green lights on the wingtips, and white strobe lights. At a distance, the combined effect of these lights, especially during takeoff or landing, can be perceived as a single flashing point of light exhibiting various colors.
Question 5: Is it possible to distinguish between natural astronomical events and human-made sources in these instances?
Differentiation requires careful observation and analysis. Examining the object’s trajectory, frequency and pattern of the flashes, and comparing with known satellite or aircraft positions can aid in identifying the source. Using telescopic equipment may also reveal the object’s true nature.
Question 6: Are there any specific resources for identifying potential satellites or aircraft?
Several websites and mobile apps provide real-time tracking data for satellites and aircraft. These resources allow observers to compare the location and movement of known objects with their visual observations, assisting in source identification.
It is crucial to maintain a skeptical yet open-minded approach when observing unusual celestial events. Accurate interpretation requires considering a range of potential explanations and employing scientific methods to differentiate between natural phenomena and human-made artifacts.
The subsequent sections will summarize key findings and highlight strategies for accurate visual assessment of potential “blue and red flashing star in sky” events.
Tips for Investigating Potential “Blue and Red Flashing Star in Sky” Events
Accurate identification of observed aerial phenomena requires methodical observation and critical analysis. The following tips provide a framework for investigating reports of a “blue and red flashing star in sky,” facilitating informed conclusions.
Tip 1: Record Precise Observation Details. Document the exact date, time, and location of the sighting. Note the direction and elevation of the object in the sky, and the surrounding weather conditions. Accurate records provide crucial context for subsequent analysis.
Tip 2: Assess Atmospheric Conditions. Evaluate the clarity of the sky, noting any haze, clouds, or turbulence. Atmospheric conditions can significantly impact the perceived color and intensity of light, potentially contributing to misinterpretation.
Tip 3: Consider Known Artificial Satellites. Consult satellite tracking websites or apps to determine if any known satellites were in the vicinity at the time of the observation. This step can rule out satellite reflections as a potential cause.
Tip 4: Evaluate Potential Aircraft Activity. Check local flight tracking websites or apps to identify any aircraft operating in the area. The presence of aircraft, particularly those with strobe lights, can mimic the appearance of a flashing celestial object.
Tip 5: Employ Optical Aids When Possible. Utilize binoculars or a telescope to obtain a magnified view of the object. Higher magnification may reveal details that are not visible to the naked eye, such as the shape or structure of the light source.
Tip 6: Consult Multiple Observers. Corroborate observations with other individuals who may have witnessed the same event from different locations. Multiple perspectives can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.
Tip 7: Rule Out Ground-Based Light Sources. Ensure the observed effect is not caused by ground-based lighting, such as security lights or communication towers. Obstructed views or atmospheric distortion can cause terrestrial lights to appear as distant celestial objects.
Adherence to these tips promotes a systematic approach to investigating potential “blue and red flashing star in sky” events, reducing the likelihood of misidentification and promoting informed analysis.
The subsequent conclusion will summarize the main points of this article and emphasize the importance of applying critical thinking when analyzing reports of unusual celestial phenomena.
Conclusion
The exploration of “blue and red flashing star in sky” has revealed the complex interplay of atmospheric conditions, artificial objects, and optical phenomena that can contribute to such observations. Atmospheric distortion, satellite reflections, aircraft navigation lights, and instrumental artifacts have all been identified as potential sources of misinterpretation. Understanding these factors is crucial for discerning between genuine astronomical events and more mundane explanations.
The significance of this analysis lies in promoting critical thinking and informed observation of the night sky. While the allure of unexplained phenomena is undeniable, rigorous scientific investigation, grounded in established physical principles, remains paramount. Continued vigilance, combined with the application of sound observational practices, will contribute to a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the celestial realm, fostering scientific literacy and dispelling unfounded speculation.
